top of page
Search

Today in Supreme Court History: October 9

  • Writer: captcrisis
    captcrisis
  • Oct 8, 2023
  • 1 min read

Pilon v. Bordenkircher, 444 U.S. 1 (decided October 9, 1979): Court, relying on its own recent precedent, reverses the denial of habeas and remands back to District Court; after state court conviction for manslaughter, lower court applied former standard for violation of Due Process (reversing only if there is “no evidence in support of conviction”); new, more defendant-friendly standard is whether if “after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt”


Agoston v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 340 U.S. 844 (decided October 9, 1950): denying cert in murder case; Frankfurter in support writes to emphasize that denying cert does not mean the Court is affirming the decision below; Douglas and Black dissent, pointing out that this case is similar to a recent case where the Court had overturned conviction on Due Process grounds (Turner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 338 U.S. 62) (in that pre-Miranda case, appearance before magistrate was delayed until confession had been obtained by police after “prolonged questioning”)

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Today in Supreme Court History: December 12

Bush v. Gore , 531 U.S. 98 (decided December 12, 2000): Stopped the recount ordered by the Florida Supreme Court (though the Court had already stayed it), citing Equal Protection violation; hard to su

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: December 11

Texas v. Pennsylvania , 141 S.Ct. 1230 (decided December 11, 2020): Texas has no standing to contest how other states conduct their elections (the Constitutional objection argued appears to be that Tr

 
 
 
Today in Supreme Court History: December 10

Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson , 595 U.S. 30 (decided December 10, 2021): suit against abortion “bounty hunter” statute (Texas S. 8, see Sept. 1) can proceed against state health officials having col

 
 
 

Comments


Thanks for submitting!

bottom of page