Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (decided March 7, 1983): police officers had immunity in prisoners’ suit alleging they were convicted due to officers’ perjury; testimony in court was not “acting under color of law” so no §1983 liability
Baldwin v. Franks, 120 U.S. 678 (decided March 7, 1887): federal statute, and not treaty with China guaranteeing safety of Chinese nationals, governed charges of beating and driving out of Chinese nationals from town of Nicolaus, California, and was outside the reach of Congress because interstate commerce not involved; opinion by Waite (in his typically dreary style); Harlan dissents (and as he often did, correctly)
Talley v. California, 362 U.S. 60 (decided March 7, 1960): striking down on Fourteenth Amendment grounds (incorporating First Amendment) city ordinance prohibiting distributing handbills which did not indicate who prepared or distributed them (handbills urged boycott of businesses which would not hire nonwhites)
Wooden v. United States, 595 U.S. 360 (decided March 7, 2022): burgling ten different units in storage facility on same night counted as only one prior offense for purposes of aggravation provision of Armed Career Criminal Act
South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (decided March 7, 1966): Voting Rights Act of 1965 is within Congress’s powers to enforce Fifteenth Amendment (provisions at issue were elimination of poll tests, presence of federal inspectors, etc.)
Federal Power Comm’n v. Tuscarora Indian Nation, 362 U.S. 99 (decided March 7, 1960): Indian lands were owned in fee simple and were not “reservations” excluded from eminent domain; New York could condemn and flood land for hydroelectric project (with just compensation)
ICC v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R.R. Co., 216 U.S. 531 (decided March 7, 1910): ICC can order main line to install switch connection upon request of shipper but not on request of lateral line carrying only passengers within state
Wearry v. Cain, 577 U.S. 385 (decided March 7, 2016): prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory information, Brady v. Maryland, 1963, includes statements from witnesses casting doubt on credibility of prosecution’s main witness
Comments