top of page

Today in Supreme Court History: June 11

Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (decided June 11, 1993): ordinance prohibiting killing of animal in ceremony not for use as food (Santería) struck down as violating church’s First Amendment rights (ordinance was passed “in direct response to the opening of the church” -- but what if the church had been there for years?)


Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, 584 U.S. 756 (decided June 11, 2018): Ohio’s presumption that voters who don’t return card and don’t vote for four years have moved (and are therefore struck from the rolls) upheld as consistent with National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (hardly seems like a fair rule)


Sveen v. Melin, 584 U.S. 811 (decided June 11, 2018): applying Minnesota’s statute automatically revoking claim on life insurance upon divorce to pre-statute policies did not violate Contracts Clause, art. I, §10, cl. 1; did not change the expectations of the policyholder or of ex-wife (questionable decision; there are various kinds of divorce)


Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (decided June 11, 2001): police needed warrant to utilize thermal-imaging device to detect high-intensity lamps (used to grow marijuana in a house; I had a friend who used to do that, circa 1982) because device not in general public use and revealed information otherwise unobtainable without physical intrusion


United States v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310 (decided June 11, 1990): struck down another flag desecration law (like Texas v. Johnson) on First Amendment grounds; unlike in Johnson, this one did not require that flag desecration be associated with a political message (Doonesbury had a good comic strip on this while the case was pending: the first panel had an American flag and Mike Doonesbury dared readers to throw the newspaper out, unavoidably desecrating the flag and breaking that law)


Great American Federal Savings & Loan v. Novotny, 442 U.S. 366 (decided June 11, 1979): male fired after complaining of discrimination against female employees might have Title VII claim but can’t sue directly under 42 U.S.C. §1985(3) (conspiracy to deprive of civil rights); must go through EEOC first


Bluefield Water Works v. Public Service Comm’n, 262 U.S. 679 (decided June 11, 1923): order setting public utility’s rates so low that it wouldn’t earn a return was a “taking” without just compensation


China Agritech Inc. v. Resh, 584 U.S. 732 (decided June 11, 2018): failure-to-get-class-certification tolling of statute of limitations available to putative class members to sue on their own (American Pipe v. Utah, 1974) does not apply to future attempts at class action


Nix v. United States, 467 U.S. 431 (decided June 11, 1984): evidence is not excluded which would have been discovered anyway despite police misconduct (body would have been found anyway even though location told to police while being denied right to counsel) (“independent source rule” and “inevitable discovery rule”)


Paine Lumber Co. v. Neal, 244 U.S. 459 (decided June 11, 1917): Sherman Act does not provide for private parties going to court to stop alleged restraint on trade (here, windowmaking companies trying to stop a union boycott)

Recent Posts

See All

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page