Ex parte Clarke, 128 U.S. 395 (decided August 7, 1888): Harlan denies habeas to a steamship operator who had been convicted of selling alcohol in violation of a recently-enacted Pennsylvania statute; rejects argument that the statute is unconstitutional; as an aside he also believes that Congress wouldn’t have the power to override it (maybe this is why a Constitutional amendment ended up being necessary?)
top of page
Recent Posts
See AllMcLeod v. General Electric Co. , 87 S.Ct. 5 (decided September 21, 1966): Harlan reinstates NLRB decision forcing General Electric to...
Barthuli v. Board of Trustees of Jefferson Elementary School District , 434 U.S. 1337 (decided September 20, 1977): Rehnquist says he...
United States v. United Liquors Corp. , 77 S.Ct. 208 (decided September 19, 1956): Reed denies stay of antitrust judgment prohibiting...
bottom of page
コメント