Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corp., 549 U.S. 561 (decided April 2, 2007): “modification” can mean different things in different (complicated) environmental statutes; the upshot was that coal-fired plant should have gotten a permit before upgrading
Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of City of Burlington, 566 U.S. 318 (decided April 2, 2012): strip search upon incarceration is not unreasonable under Fourth Amendment
Encino Motorcars v. Navarro, 584 U.S. — (decided April 2, 2018): the guy at the auto dealership who tells you about service contract options doesn’t have to be paid overtime — he’s one of those people “servicing” autos who is exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act
Kisela v. Hughes, 584 U.S. — (decided April 2, 2018): shooting plaintiff who was holding a knife over another woman and wouldn’t drop it does not violate “clearly established law” and therefore qualified immunity; §1983 allegation of excessive force dismissed
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Comm’n, 572 U.S. 185 (decided April 2, 2014): statutory limit on total amount one person can donate to political candidates/committees violates First Amendment; 5 - 4 decision
Northwest, Inc. v. Ginsberg, 572 U.S. 273 (decided April 2, 2014): extra-contractual claim against airline which revoked frequent flyer status (misrepresentation, breach of good faith and fair dealing) preempted by Airline Deregulation Act
De La Rama v. De La Rama, 201 U.S. 303 (decided April 2, 1906): upholding Philippine divorce verdict; wife established adultery by proof that husband abandoned her and shacked up with three women, getting them all pregnant (I would say the wife made out her case)
Rehberg v. Paulk, 566 U.S. 356 (decided April 2, 2012): grand jury witness who allegedly fabricated evidence can’t be sued for damages under §1983; enjoyed same immunity as trial witness (can’t blame the accused for trying to sue; grand jury had returned three indictments, all of them dismissed for insufficiency of evidence)
Texas v. Cobb, 532 U.S. 162 (decided April 2, 2001): no deprivation of right to counsel when defendant charged with one crime (burglary) confesses to separate uncharged crime (murder of the occupants); 5 - 4 decision
United States v. Caceres, 440 U.S. 741 (decided April 2, 1979): conversation with IRS agent admissible in bribery trial even though recorded in violation of IRS protocols
Comments