Today in Supreme Court History: April 12

NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 (decided April 12, 1937): in an early demonstration of the “switch” of 1937, upholding Constitutionality of National Labor Relations Act (and actions of NLRB) (forcing major steel producer to bargain with union)

Texas v. White, 74 U.S. 700 (decided April 12, 1869): holding, mostly, that Texas is a state over which the Supreme Court has jurisdiction, and secondarily, that it had jurisdiction over suit against Texas for recovery of bonds issued pre-Civil War (limited to its facts in Morgan v. U.S., 1885)

Gerende v. Board of Supervisors of Elections of Baltimore City, 341 U.S. 56 (decided April 12, 1951): upholding state statute requiring candidates for public office to declare they are not subversives

Evansville & Bowling Green Packet Co. v. Chero Cola Bottling Co., 271 U.S. 19 (decided April 12, 1926): wharfboat (always tied to wharf, used as office, warehouse, etc., connected to city’s water, electric and telephone systems, never transports cargo) was not “vessel” within meaning of traditional rule limiting owner’s liability to value of ship plus cargo; therefore no admiralty jurisdiction for limitation of liability where plaintiff’s merchandise lost when wharfboat sank

Liberato v. Royer, 270 U.S. 535 (decided April 12, 1926): Italian parents could not recover compensation due deceased son upon whom they were dependent because Pennsylvania no-fault scheme expressly disqualified foreign parents from recovery; treaty with Italy extended only to right to bring suits alleging fault

People v. Wilson, 318 U.S. 688 (decided April 12, 1943): habeas remanded to state trial court because state’s highest court had changed the law in the meantime (issue was whether conviction could be vacated where guilty plea had been obtained fraudulently, Lyons v. Goldstein, 290 N.Y. 19)

Associated Press v. NLRB, 301 U.S. 103 (decided April 12, 1937): another early “switch” case, this one holding that news gathering organization was involved in “interstate commerce” and subject to NLRB jurisdiction

Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Marcus, 213 U.S. 288 (decided April 12, 1909): plaintiff’s case (fell when train jerked while she was crossing between trains via their vestibules; allegation was train should have given her notice that it was about to move) should not have gone to jury

Greenleaf-Johnson Lumber Co. v. Garrison, 237 U.S. 251 (decided April 12, 1915): no “taking” when Congress established new harbor line for expanded Navy yard which destroyed wharves of private owners

Massachusetts v. New York, 271 U.S. 65 (decided April 12, 1926): Massachusetts, incredibly, claimed land in western New York, citing a pre-Revolutionary War grant (you know, like the one that gave Connecticut part of what is now California, https://mieummedia.com/2019/04/10/that-time-connecticuts-borders-extended-to-the-pacific-ocean-explained/); it supposedly had sold it in 1786 to Nathaniel Gorham, at the time the “president” of the Articles of Confederation Congress (who the next year chaired the formative Committee of the Whole weeks of the Constitutional Convention)

Bissonnette v. Lepage Bakeries, 601 U.S. 246 (decided April 12, 2024): Federal Arbitration Act exception for workers engaged in interstate commerce applies even if not working for a transportation company (here, bakery delivery drivers); voiding arbitration clause in employment contract

Macquarie Infrastructure v. Moab Partners, 601 U.S. 257 (decided April 12, 2024): can’t sue for incomplete disclosure in statements relating to buying/selling securities (Rule 10b-5(b)) if omissions do not make the statements misleading (disclosed decline of fuel oil sales but omitted fact that this was due to international regulation making that grade of oil hard to sell)